Have You Been Injured? We're Ready to Fight for You.

Federal Medical Malpractice Reform Bill Put to Rest for 2016

Published on Jun 9, 2016 at 7:37 pm in Medical Malpractice.

On March 17th, congressional GOP leaders attempted to pass a medical malpractice reform bill which has been a top priority of the Federal Physicians Association for quite some time. If allowed to pass, the bill would have placed a severe nationwide cap on any claimable economic damages and attorney fees involved in medical malpractice cases. This cap would have two goals—to discourage malpractice lawsuits from being filed and to change the rules of evidence in civil cases in order to make it harder for medical malpractice plaintiffs to succeed in court.

Similar reforms have been enacted in a number of states already. Supporters claim that such reforms can lower the costs of healthcare while increasing physician supply, but there isn’t much in the way of actual academic evidence which supports that claim. The argument for enacting a similar reform on a nationwide level seems to focus on forcing physicians to not base a decision as to where they practice on any statewide reforms, but as Dean Clancy, U.S. Congress vet and advocate of the healthcare industry argues, the choice of where a physician wishes to practice shouldn’t be decided on by Congress. Physicians are free to practice wherever they wish. They shouldn’t be compared to imported cargo.

Similarly, patients should remain free to file a lawsuit that’s worth the trouble of actually filing the paperwork if they feel an injustice was done. Our nation’s court system is one of the few ways U.S. citizens have of directly affecting the multitudes of ways in which corporations and major businesses can interfere with the personal safety and health of citizens. The way the current system works gives every person a very potent voice in regards to their family’s healthcare.

Furthermore, most civil judicial matters—especially any matters regarding liability—have almost always been a matter of the states, and not of Congress. The socio-economic differences from state to state can vary significantly and can have a large impact on legal cases involving liability. Enforcing any type of strict judicial requirements would only limit the amount of social and economic diversity that each of the U.S. states currently enjoys.

Despite the GOP’s and Physicians Association’s best efforts, the federal med-mal reform bill did not pass, luckily. The committee’s members spoke up against the bill by saying that the “federal government has no authority to overwrite state civil liability laws”. Until further notice, the reform is stated to be “dead for the remainder of this Congress (i.e., through 2016)”.

The party which opposed the reform bill is majorly comprised of members of the Freedom Caucus, a Republican congressional caucus that aims to give Americans a direct voice against the U.S. government. So far, it seems their efforts have resulted in a win for the legal profession and for Americans who believe in the power of having a voice against major corporations.

Louisville personal injury lawyer Tad Thomas believes in providing our nation’s citizens with the tools to raise their legal concerns and is dedicated to helping Kentucky residents fight against major corporations that prioritize profit over the health and safety of their customers. Contact Thomas Law Offices to find out how we can be of service.

Meet Your Team

Tad Thomas - Trial Lawyer

Tad Thomas

Managing Partner

Tad Thomas has dedicated his practice to representing plaintiffs in various types of civil litigation, including personal injury, business litigation, class actions, and multi-district litigation.

After graduating with his law degree in 2000 from Salmon P. Chase College of Law at Northern Kentucky University, Mr. Thomas immediately opened his own private practice and began representing injury victims.

In 2011, Thomas Law Offices was established in Louisville, Kentucky. Over the past decade, Mr. Thomas has expanded his firm and now has offices in three additional locations: Cincinnati, Ohio, Columbia, Missouri, and Chicago, Illinois. He is also a frequent lecturer on topics like trial skills and ethics and technology.

Free Case Evaluation

At Thomas Law Offices, our personal injury attorneys recognize that our potential clients are likely going through some of the most difficult times of their lives. We don't want you to have to worry about paying out-of-pocket for legal advice when you're just starting to learn your legal rights and options. That's why we provide free case evaluations. We'll offer our expert advice about your potential case and walk you through how we can help you.

Call us or fill out the form below to tell us about your potential case and a personal injury lawyer will get back to you as quickly as possible.

Legal & Firm News

What You Need to Know About Business Litigation and Contingency Fees

If your business has ever been involved in a legal matter, you may be surprised to hear the two phrases together: business litigation and contingency fees. Traditionally, it has been more common to associate a contingency fee model with personal injury law involving individual parties rather than businesses. But this is no longer always the […]

Read More

Signs of PTSD in Military Service Members

It’s estimated that up to one-third of military service members suffer from PTSD. PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder, is a mental health condition that can develop following a traumatic event. This usually means an event involving actual or threatened death, serious injury, or abuse. People who have seen combat, witnessed death, or experienced a life-threatening situation […]

Read More

AAA Conducts Study Examining Travel Before and During COVID-19

In 2021, new research from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety’s New American Driving Survey revealed shifts in driving, traveling, and commuting patterns in the United States. The statistics gathered between July 2019 and December 2020 cannot be analyzed without consideration of COVID-19’s unignorable impact on the numbers—numbers showing marked differences from previous years’ findings.

Read More